As we previously reported, the Chinese government implemented additional levels of capital control at the end of 2016, to curb Chinese capital outflow. The measures have proven to be effective, but have also come at a price, notably in suppressing genuine outbound acquisitions and increasing perceived deal certainty risks associated with Chinese buyers. For now, international businesses will need to take this into account in their overall transaction planning.
Following the “going-out” policy promoted by the Chinese government for over a decade, China became a net capital export country in 2015, fuelled by 579 overseas acquisitions worth USD 54 billion. In 2016, the value of Chinese overseas acquisitions further increased to a record high of USD 107 billion. At the same time, slower economic growth at home and higher US interest rates have kept the renminbi under significant depreciation pressure. In 2016, the renminbi dropped by almost 7% against the US dollar, an eight-year low, even though the Chinese government spent large forex reserves to stabilise the renminbi rate. Fast capital outflows through outbound acquisitions further exacerbated the devaluation pressure. While promoting Chinese companies going out remains a long-term policy, the short-term pressure on the renminbi has prompted the Chinese government to implement an interim policy curbing capital outflow. We reported on these measures in February’s In context.
The capital control measures appear to be effective: net investment capital outflow of USD 29 billion in Q3 2016 was transformed into to a net investment capital inflow of USD 17 billion in Q4 2016. However, the measures appear to have come at a price, notably in suppressing genuine outbound acquisitions and increasing perceived deal certainty risks associated with Chinese buyers.
In this respect, a recent merger market report found that:
It is too early to tell when the capital control measures will be adjusted or removed. As is the case for many other policies in China, the Chinese government retains considerable flexibility and latitude in adjusting the rigour of its policy implementation. Between the short-term urgency of maintaining a stable renminbi and the long-term policy of promoting economic growth through overseas investments, the Chinese government has chosen to prioritise addressing the issue of currency stability.
However, in the long run, a non-transparent and tight control of renminbi value and capital flow could not only hurt the international community’s confidence in the Chinese economy, but also hinder the Chinese government’s currency efforts. This, in turn, could result in more serious economic issues. For this reason, we still believe that the capital control measures are temporary and that the Chinese government may currently be using a relief period to test and develop more systematic policy solutions. In the meantime, transactions with potential Chinese buyers remain subject to these policy uncertainties, which need to be taken into account by international businesses in their overall transaction planning.
14 October 2020
14 October 2020
10 July 2020
12 June 2020
19 May 2020
24 April 2020
30 March 2020
5 February 2020
17 December 2019
15 October 2019