Home > Legal articles > CJ: one can sue before any EU court for online infringement
The CJ ruled that the relevant criterion for establishing jurisdiction in online copyright infringement cases is whether copies of the infringed works are accessible online in the member state of the court addressed. This is a considerably lower threshold than the criterion that the website activity be directed at that member state, as established in earlier case law.
In Pinckney v Mediatech a copyright infringing CD was made by a company in Austria and sold by several companies in the UK on a website which was also accessible in France. The French copyright owner sued the Austrian company in France. Questions regarding the jurisdiction of the French court ended up in Luxembourg before the Court of Justice (“CJ“).
The CJ ruled that in the case of a copyright infringement committed on or via a website, the court will be able to hear the action if the website is accessible in that court’s jurisdiction. This is an approach that deviates from earlier case law. According to prior rulings, the claimant had to prove that the website was specifically targeted at consumers in the member state where protection was being requested. The sole limitation is that the national court of the country of access can only award damages suffered in that jurisdiction.
This ruling will make it easier for national courts of the member states to establish jurisdiction when a copyright infringement takes place on or via a generally accessible website. Copyright owners as a consequence will be able to sue the entities in the courts of any member state from where the infringing contents are accessible. This should be especially useful in proceedings where provisional (injunction) measures are requested or in main proceedings when the infringer is based outside the EEX since in those cases it might be possible to obtain a cross-border measure. This is likely to apply to online infringement of other IP rights as well.
15 July 2020
17 December 2019
16 December 2019
ECJ provides more options for forum shopping in connection with Community designs
15 October 2019
The General Court’s Starbucks and FIAT rulings: what’s new and what’s not
17 July 2019
Trend: parallel trade and geo-blocking in the distribution chain scrutinised
17 July 2019
The Hague Court of Appeal gives guidance on standard essential patent licensing and FRAND
16 July 2019
Commission’s decision to investigate Nike tax rulings explained
17 April 2019
ECJ’s landmark ruling on “skinny labeling” impacts practice for generic medicinal products
17 April 2019
Copyright holders one step closer to better protection in digital market
14 March 2019
Plant-related patent uncertainty as European Patent Office changes view again
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P.O. Box 75084
1070 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands