Home > Legal articles > Cookies with no or low privacy risk may also be exempted from consent requirement
A recently proposed amendment aims to exempt cookies with no or low privacy risks from the consent requirement. Analytics cookies, as well as affiliate and a/b testing cookies may be exempted. Websites using these types of cookies will not have to ask users for prior informed consent if the proposed amendment is enacted.
Since the new cookies rules have gone into effect, there has been some objection to the types of cookies that require the prior informed consent from website users.
To address these objections, the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs had previously indicated that analytics cookies may be exempted from the consent requirement. Analytics cookies are often only placed to measure the website’s use and generally have little to no impact on the user’s privacy. At the time, the Minister indicated that this exemption only related to first-party cookies (that is, cookies placed by the website owner). In a proposed amendment, the Minister has now indicated that, in principle, all types of analytics cookies can be exempted (both those placed by the website owner: first-party cookies, as well as those placed by third parties: third-party cookies). The proposed amendment is “technology neutral”, meaning that the exemption relates to cookies with little to no impact on the user’s privacy. In addition to analytics cookies (which analyse and improve websites), the Minister mentioned that affiliate cookies (which analyse the effectiveness of advertisements) and a/b testing cookies (which compare the effectiveness of multiple types of advertisements) may also fall under this exemption.
The Minister also indicated that where cookies do require consent, there should be a possibility to provide consent implicitly. This requires a clear action from the user which infers consent. Implied consent cannot be construed by an omission to act.
17 December 2020
EU Parliament approves new collective redress mechanisms for consumers
17 December 2020
Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act: Commission flexes its muscles
16 November 2020
Fake online reviews – back as area of enforcement by competition authorities
23 October 2020
Privilege of foreign in-house counsel: English court sets standard, Dutch to follow?
15 October 2020
16 July 2020
Landmark ruling on validity of personal data transfer mechanisms
15 July 2020
13 July 2020
Dutch Supreme Court reaffirms legal privilege – what does this mean in practice?
10 July 2020
Dutch Supreme Court: credit claims can be assigned and securitisation vehicle has duty of care
15 June 2020
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P.O. Box 75084
1070 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands