Home > Legal articles > ECJ helps IP owners battle online sales of counterfeit goods
Good news for rightsholders in the battle against the online sale of counterfeit goods. The ECJ recently ruled that customs authorities can seize and destroy counterfeit goods purchased for personal use by individuals in the EU from non-EU websites. This is possible even if the website is not targeted at the EU.
Under the Customs Regulation, customs may take action against goods entering the EU that are suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights. Can they also seize a single parcel that is bought by a private person for personal use on a non-EU website? This was the key element of the question referred to the ECJ concerning a dispute between Blomqvist and Rolex. Blomqvist is a Danish citizen who ordered, as it turned out, a counterfeit Rolex watch for personal use from a Chinese website. When the watch arrived, Danish Customs seized the watch and suspended its release. In a dispute between the two parties about the suspension of the release and destruction of the watch, the Danish Supreme Court referred preliminary questions to the ECJ with regard to the applicability of the Customs Regulation to this situation. In this case, it was not the buyer who infringed intellectual property rights since the watch was bought for personal use.
ECJ ruling
The ECJ held that under the Customs Regulation it is possible to act against counterfeit goods, even if there is not any ‘distribution to the public’, within the meaning of the Copyright Directive, and any ‘use in the course of trade’, within the meaning of the Trade Marks Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation. When consumers buy these goods for personal use, in general there is no infringement of an intellectual property right. However, within the scope of the Customs Regulation, the ECJ ruled these goods can be classified as infringing. It is not necessary for the goods to have been the subject, prior to the sale, of an offer for sale or advertisement targeting consumers of an EU member state.
This ruling is good news for rightsholders as it strengthens their position. It gives them not only more opportunities to act against the online sale of counterfeit goods from non-EU websites under the Customs Regulation, but it also gives them more opportunities to act against the purchase by a consumer.
15 July 2020
17 December 2019
16 December 2019
ECJ provides more options for forum shopping in connection with Community designs
15 October 2019
The General Court’s Starbucks and FIAT rulings: what’s new and what’s not
17 July 2019
Trend: parallel trade and geo-blocking in the distribution chain scrutinised
17 July 2019
The Hague Court of Appeal gives guidance on standard essential patent licensing and FRAND
16 July 2019
Commission’s decision to investigate Nike tax rulings explained
17 April 2019
ECJ’s landmark ruling on “skinny labeling” impacts practice for generic medicinal products
17 April 2019
Copyright holders one step closer to better protection in digital market
14 March 2019
Plant-related patent uncertainty as European Patent Office changes view again
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P.O. Box 75084
1070 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands