Home > Legal articles > Genuine use of a Community trademark in one EU country can be sufficient
In Leno v Hagelkruis (C‑149/11) (ONEL/OMEL) the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “CJ”) was asked to decide whether it is sufficient to use a Community trademark ‘genuinely’ in the territory of a single Member State only to satisfy the ‘genuine use’ condition in article 15(1) of the Community Trademark Regulation (the “CTMR”).
On 19 December 2012 the CJ ruled that “the territorial borders of the Member States should be disregarded in the assessment of whether a trade mark has been put to ‘genuine use in the Community’”. Territorial scope is just one of the factors to determine genuine use. It is for national courts to assess whether use of a Community mark is genuine (i.e. no token use) “taking account of all the relevant facts and circumstances, including:
Download
Please download the legal alert here in English.
15 July 2020
17 December 2019
16 December 2019
ECJ provides more options for forum shopping in connection with Community designs
15 October 2019
The General Court’s Starbucks and FIAT rulings: what’s new and what’s not
17 July 2019
Trend: parallel trade and geo-blocking in the distribution chain scrutinised
17 July 2019
The Hague Court of Appeal gives guidance on standard essential patent licensing and FRAND
16 July 2019
Commission’s decision to investigate Nike tax rulings explained
17 April 2019
ECJ’s landmark ruling on “skinny labeling” impacts practice for generic medicinal products
17 April 2019
Copyright holders one step closer to better protection in digital market
14 March 2019
Plant-related patent uncertainty as European Patent Office changes view again
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P.O. Box 75084
1070 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands