Every month, we highlight settlements and other interesting developments involving criminal and supervisory authorities around the globe. In this article, we discuss a record penalty in France for UBS and two settlements relating to alleged violations of the FCPA (Cognizant and Mobile TeleSystems). In the UBS case, a French court found UBS AG and UBS (France) SA guilty of illicit solicitation and of laundering tax fraud proceeds. In the USD 25 million settlement with US technology company Cognizant, the DOJ declined to prosecute for multiple reasons, which we will highlight below. We also discuss the USD 950 million settlement with Mobile TeleSystems, Russia's biggest mobile phone company. This is the third case brought by the SEC and the DOJ involving public companies operating in the Uzbek telecommunications market.
US technological solutions company Cognizant has agreed to pay the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) USD 25 million to settle charges that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other applicable laws. The SEC alleged that, between 2013 and 2015, certain high-level Cognizant employees and agents authorised a third-party construction company responsible for building an Indian office park, to pay a USD 2 million bribe to one or more Indian government officials. The bribe was aimed at securing the planning permit for the office park. According to both the SEC and the Department of Justice (DOJ), Cognizant employees and agents hid the company's USD 2 million bribe by falsifying the construction company's invoices at the end of the office park project. All of this was authorised by Cognizant's president and its chief legal officer. According to the SEC, Cognizant employees and officers allegedly also falsified the company's internal books and records. The SEC's order states that Cognizant has agreed to pay a civil penalty of USD 6 million and approximately USD 19 million to the SEC in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.
The DOJ has declined to prosecute Cognizant, and Cognizant has not admitted or denied the allegations. The DOJ's decision was based, inter alia, on the following circumstances:
- Cognizant's voluntary self-disclosure of the matters within two weeks of their board learning of the conduct;
- Cognizant's thorough and comprehensive investigation;
- Cognizant's full and proactive cooperation in the matter;
- the existence and effectiveness of Cognizant's pre-existing compliance program;
- Cognizant's full remediation, including terminating the employment and disciplining employees and contractors involved;
- the fact that the DOJ was able to conduct an independent investigation and identify culpable individuals as a result of Cognizant's timely voluntary disclosure.